ROI: When internet marketing practices move to traditional media
As you can imagine, ROI is everything in internet advertising. But what happens if you move from the internet into traditional media? For traditional FMCG brands, this very question seems like the world turned on its head.
Well, as I went into traditional media last year, it showed me that the marketing metrics for traditional media are not exactly mind-blowing. Even if you optimize a radio campaign by balancing cost/TRP per hour and per station versus the online traffic flow on your site, then you are still working with best estimates. The data of Wave 9 of the leading radio study in Belgium by CIM is based on the declared actions of consumers in 2943 dairies and 4327 interviews, while with in internet advertising ALL of your audience votes through their ACTUAL actions (see previous post on ROI).
This reminds me of a BMMA meeting that happened 2 weeks ago, where the BMMA invited MSN to present its plans with Windows Live. The BMMA is the Belgian Media & Marketing Association, and has more 'traditional' roots in the Belgian marketing landscape than the I.A.B., even though the BMMA is really opening up. At the end of the presentation, the country manager from MSN responded pointedly to a question about why the new Windows Live AdCenter system did not include the more old-style GRP metrics. In her answer, she basically suggested that traditional media start using metrics that better track ROI than GRP does, while acknowledging the historical value of this metric.
Just to be sure, it would not be an easy task to include GRP metrics into online systems, as long as the underlying data is not digitally generated. Moreover, because online advertisements (like banners) are often routed through a quagmire of ad-serving and tracking systems, it could make it more difficult to match Reach data like GRP with Activity data. For example, the Impressions and Clicks of a campaign may be captured in the system of the portal, while Clicks and Activity data is tracked in the system of the advertiser. Clicks in both systems (portal and advertiser) often do not correspond and show a mysterious yet usually stable difference of a few percentage points.
Technicalities aside, what should we be doing with GRP? I mean, last time that I remember, GRP is basically people noting down in a dairy which radio stations they have listened to over the last day. Or consumers having to declare to an interviewer which radio station they like the best. Not surprisingly, the radio group of the CIM, while obviously providing great and valuable data, is nevertheless entangled in discussions about "the interviewer effect". I will not elaborate on it now, but you can find a detailed description about the CIM Radio Study Methodology here: http://www.cim.be/agora/radio/CIM_Methodo_w9_NL_060116.pdf .
So if the CIM delivers great work in making radio investments more measurable, why is a discussion about one of the important variables like "the interviewer effect" in essence pointless? The answer is that the future of making judgment calls about the effectiveness of radio advertising lays not in consumer interviews or people penciling down their radio feelings. The future of ROI in radio advertising will happen when we push the metrics and measuring systems that rule in the online world into the radio world.
And that is exactly what is happening! Indeed, it was the most exciting news to hear that Google bought dMarc Broadcasting Inc.(Click here for more info).
That is, if you buy into the notion that the internet marketing world of today is defining the overall marketing industry of tomorrow.
What happens is that dMarc Broadcasting has developed a system that allows any marketer to upload and serve radio ads via an online system, much the way you can buy a textlink campaign via Google AdWords today. You can also select radio stations or time slots based on the demographics that are important to you, much like you will be able to target on gender, age or even consumer preferences via Windows Live AdCenter. Once your campaign is programmed online, you have access to real-time tracking of the actual deployment of the campaign, including reach data or when a specific radio spot aired.
As a result, even the smallest advertiser can now access the radio advertising market. At the same time, big companies can adapt their radio campaigns in an instant. For example, it would be much easier now for a Delhaize, Wall-Mart or a Carrefour to include last-minute promotions in their radio spots.
Of course, for the time being, some of the information in the dMark/Google system is still based on “old-world” marketing data. It is fair to say that with analog aerial radio broadcasting, the only way to measure reach is by accessing data that is delivered by the likes of CIM and AC Nielsen. However, as new digital broadcasting technologies (XM, Sirius) will gradually replace the existing analog radio channels, this will change as well.
And even then, you may think that my excitement is a bit over the top. Well, I invite you to consider that with dMark you don't have to pay per radio spot (like, CPM in the online world). You can actually pay for each generated call to a special phone number (like, CPC). Or you can even go fully CPA (per Action, or Acquisition) and pay when a commercial transaction is generated.
The exciting news for these online companies like Google, that start investing in 'offline' marketing systems, is of course that the traditional advertising industry is much bigger than the current online advertising industry. At the same time, this evolution presents an opportunity for traditional advertisers to get an bigger say in the investment policy of their own company. This will come with increased credibility within their own company, because, as the marketing data becomes more and more based on digital input (rather than interviews, panels and personal considerations), it will become almost as reliable as the financial information within the company’s ERP system.
And as we all know, the management and leadership of your company will certainly appreciate that (and rightly so!).
Well, as I went into traditional media last year, it showed me that the marketing metrics for traditional media are not exactly mind-blowing. Even if you optimize a radio campaign by balancing cost/TRP per hour and per station versus the online traffic flow on your site, then you are still working with best estimates. The data of Wave 9 of the leading radio study in Belgium by CIM is based on the declared actions of consumers in 2943 dairies and 4327 interviews, while with in internet advertising ALL of your audience votes through their ACTUAL actions (see previous post on ROI).
This reminds me of a BMMA meeting that happened 2 weeks ago, where the BMMA invited MSN to present its plans with Windows Live. The BMMA is the Belgian Media & Marketing Association, and has more 'traditional' roots in the Belgian marketing landscape than the I.A.B., even though the BMMA is really opening up. At the end of the presentation, the country manager from MSN responded pointedly to a question about why the new Windows Live AdCenter system did not include the more old-style GRP metrics. In her answer, she basically suggested that traditional media start using metrics that better track ROI than GRP does, while acknowledging the historical value of this metric.Just to be sure, it would not be an easy task to include GRP metrics into online systems, as long as the underlying data is not digitally generated. Moreover, because online advertisements (like banners) are often routed through a quagmire of ad-serving and tracking systems, it could make it more difficult to match Reach data like GRP with Activity data. For example, the Impressions and Clicks of a campaign may be captured in the system of the portal, while Clicks and Activity data is tracked in the system of the advertiser. Clicks in both systems (portal and advertiser) often do not correspond and show a mysterious yet usually stable difference of a few percentage points.
Technicalities aside, what should we be doing with GRP? I mean, last time that I remember, GRP is basically people noting down in a dairy which radio stations they have listened to over the last day. Or consumers having to declare to an interviewer which radio station they like the best. Not surprisingly, the radio group of the CIM, while obviously providing great and valuable data, is nevertheless entangled in discussions about "the interviewer effect". I will not elaborate on it now, but you can find a detailed description about the CIM Radio Study Methodology here: http://www.cim.be/agora/radio/CIM_Methodo_w9_NL_060116.pdf .
So if the CIM delivers great work in making radio investments more measurable, why is a discussion about one of the important variables like "the interviewer effect" in essence pointless? The answer is that the future of making judgment calls about the effectiveness of radio advertising lays not in consumer interviews or people penciling down their radio feelings. The future of ROI in radio advertising will happen when we push the metrics and measuring systems that rule in the online world into the radio world.
And that is exactly what is happening! Indeed, it was the most exciting news to hear that Google bought dMarc Broadcasting Inc.(Click here for more info).That is, if you buy into the notion that the internet marketing world of today is defining the overall marketing industry of tomorrow.
What happens is that dMarc Broadcasting has developed a system that allows any marketer to upload and serve radio ads via an online system, much the way you can buy a textlink campaign via Google AdWords today. You can also select radio stations or time slots based on the demographics that are important to you, much like you will be able to target on gender, age or even consumer preferences via Windows Live AdCenter. Once your campaign is programmed online, you have access to real-time tracking of the actual deployment of the campaign, including reach data or when a specific radio spot aired.
As a result, even the smallest advertiser can now access the radio advertising market. At the same time, big companies can adapt their radio campaigns in an instant. For example, it would be much easier now for a Delhaize, Wall-Mart or a Carrefour to include last-minute promotions in their radio spots.
Of course, for the time being, some of the information in the dMark/Google system is still based on “old-world” marketing data. It is fair to say that with analog aerial radio broadcasting, the only way to measure reach is by accessing data that is delivered by the likes of CIM and AC Nielsen. However, as new digital broadcasting technologies (XM, Sirius) will gradually replace the existing analog radio channels, this will change as well.
And even then, you may think that my excitement is a bit over the top. Well, I invite you to consider that with dMark you don't have to pay per radio spot (like, CPM in the online world). You can actually pay for each generated call to a special phone number (like, CPC). Or you can even go fully CPA (per Action, or Acquisition) and pay when a commercial transaction is generated.
The exciting news for these online companies like Google, that start investing in 'offline' marketing systems, is of course that the traditional advertising industry is much bigger than the current online advertising industry. At the same time, this evolution presents an opportunity for traditional advertisers to get an bigger say in the investment policy of their own company. This will come with increased credibility within their own company, because, as the marketing data becomes more and more based on digital input (rather than interviews, panels and personal considerations), it will become almost as reliable as the financial information within the company’s ERP system.
And as we all know, the management and leadership of your company will certainly appreciate that (and rightly so!).



